Use case · Recruiting

Screen more candidates without burning out.

Your recruiting worker joins first-round calls, asks consistent questions, and delivers structured candidate summaries. So your team focuses on the people who matter most.

Rx

Rx · Recruiting

Screening · candidate 4 of 12

Candidate summary ready

Criteria score: 8/10 · Recommend: advance to technical round

Consistent evaluation applied

Same 7 questions · Same scoring rubric · No drift

Workflow

What your recruiting worker does on every screen.

Before

Before the interview, the worker reviews the job brief and the candidate's background. It prepares the structured question set and flags anything to clarify before the call begins.

During

During the screen, Rx · Recruiting asks role-specific questions in a natural voice. It follows the defined scoring criteria. So every candidate gets the same structure. That reduces process drift and interviewer fatigue.

After

After the interview, it delivers a structured summary. Then it scores the responses against your criteria. Finally, it prepares the output your hiring team needs to decide what happens next.

Why it's different

Consistent evaluation. Every time.

A note-taker gives you a transcript. But someone on your team still has to interpret it, compare it, and decide what matters. A recruiting worker applies the same process to every first-round conversation. So your team gets structured evaluation, not just raw notes.

AI note-taker

Records the conversation. Gives you a transcript. Your recruiter still has to re-listen, evaluate, compare, and write the summary by hand.

DelegateWorker

Runs the screen. Asks consistent questions. Scores responses against your rubric. Delivers a structured summary your team can act on immediately.

Capabilities

Built for high-volume screening without process drift.

From question consistency to structured scoring, the worker makes first-round recruiting more repeatable, more reviewable, and less dependent on who happened to run the screen that day.

Resume review and gap flagging

Structured question delivery

Response capture and tagging

Criteria-based scoring

Red flag detection

Candidate summary generation

ATS-ready output format

Bias reduction through consistent evaluation

ROI

Faster screening. Cleaner handoff.

Hiring teams lose time when early-stage screens are inconsistent, undocumented, or hard to compare. DelegateWorker reduces coordination overhead. As a result, first-round evaluation is easier to review and act on.

80%

reduction in time-to-screen per candidate

100%

of candidates evaluated against identical criteria

3 hrs

saved per hire on first-round coordination

Security & trust

Structured, transparent, and reviewable.

Candidates are notified when an interview uses AI assistance. Transparency is part of the process, not an afterthought.

Interview data is handled securely. Structured output is accessible only to the hiring team and approved stakeholders.

For disclosure and retention details, see Security & Data Handling and disclosure guide.

FAQ

Questions about the recruiting workflow.

Will candidates know they are talking to an AI?

Yes. The worker identifies itself at the start of the call. Transparency is required.

Is this legal?

AI screening regulations vary by jurisdiction. You are responsible for compliance with local law. Our disclosure page covers the common requirements.

Can I customise the questions?

Yes. Write the question set in plain language. The worker follows it exactly.

Does it integrate with my ATS?

Greenhouse and Lever integrations are in development. Current output is structured JSON.

Put your first recruiting worker into rotation.

Join the waitlist and turn first-round screening into a structured, scalable workflow.

Join the waitlist